Judaism

 

resources • ethical vaccines • if you need help for COVID contact FLCCCA!

Current COVID treatment protocols here:

 

 

Reported anecdotally as successful, but not yet part of the FLCCCA COVID protocols are infusions of placental* stem cells and exosomes.

 

* no aborted tissue, only tissue from the placenta (“afterbirth”), tissue that was previously discarded after the baby’s birth.

 

Find FLCCCA physicians here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/providers/

 

Over the centuries, the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church has extensively addressed issues related to bodily integrity generally and vaccination specifically, including issues of voluntariness and vaccine mandates.

 

The Church has always taught and still teaches not only against homicide [1]  (including abortion [2]  as a species of unjustifiable willful homicide), but also against suicide [3]  (including the prohibition of avoidable disproportionate risk taking and other self-harm). These moral prohibitions are ancient and venerable.

 

“The early Christians are the first on record as having pronounced abortion to be the murder of human beings, for their public apologists, Athenagoras, Tertullian, and Minutius Felix (Eschbach, ‘Disp. Phys.’, Disp. iii), … appealed to their laws as forbidding all manner of murder, even that of children in the womb. The Fathers of the Church unanimously maintained the same doctrine. … The Sixth Ecumenical Council determined for the whole Church that anyone who procured abortion should bear all the punishments inflicted on murderers. In all these teachings and enactments no distinction is made between the earlier and the later stages of gestation.” [2]

 

“Suicide is the act of one who causes his own death, either by positively destroying his own life, as by inflicting on himself a mortal wound or injury… From a moral standpoint we must treat therefore not only the prohibition of positive suicide, but also the obligation incumbent on man to preserve his life,” [3] namely shunning avoidable and disproportionate risk taking.

 

Even before COVID-19, ethical objections have been raised against other abortion-derived vaccines: rubella (MM-R-II), varicella (VARIVAX), and hepatitis A (HAVRIX). [4]  Outside the USA ethical vaccine alternatives are available, except for COVID-19. [see the Ethical Vaccine Alternatives chart below.]

 

All current COVID-19 vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cells and carry a disproportionate risk of self harm, so all COVID-19 vaccines should be avoided.

 

Extensive data on these points are cited and discussed in this vaccine compendium: https://judaism.is/assets/covid-vaccine-exemption-affidavit-and-appendices-copy.pdf

 

There are ethical non-vaccine alternatives for COVID-19 prevention and treatment.  [see COVID-19 alternatives below.]

 

From the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute:

 

Everyone needs to be personally responsible for their own health and should research the COVID-19 vaccines in development carefully before making a decision whether or not to vaccinate. Children’s Health Defense and the Informed Consent Action Network have been following the science closely and are good resources for everything COVID. They can be followed at https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ and https://www.icandecide.org/covid/.

 

For an explanation of the various types of vaccines in development, please see https://lozierinstitute.org/a-visual-aid-to-viral-infection-and-vaccine-production/.

 

You can learn more about the mRNA vaccines and the PREP Act, which will shield COVID-19 vaccine makers from all liability here https://informedchoicewa.org/news/fast-facts-on-covid-19-vaccine-concerns/.

 

Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity (nih.gov) Dr. James Lyons-Weiler April 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/?fbclid=IwAR0K3TP_YCi7HDdKs1OOWExYUxGxhRSvbXNLHTtrxIVLI8FFisYEE5MlHPA

 

 

We recognize the controversies surrounding masks, social distancing, and vaccines in general.  We cannot make such prudential decisions for you, but can present the array of ethical options.

 

For a more detailed understanding, we refer you to these sources:

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

aborted fetal products

 

 

​

https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/fetalproductsall.pdf

 

 

 

​

 

ethical vaccine alternatives

 

 

​

https://soundchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/vaccine-chart-updated-scaled.jpg

 

 

​

 

 

ethical non-vaccine COVID-19 alternatives

 

 

Current COVID treatment protocols here:

 

 

Reported anecdotally as successful, but not yet part of the FLCCCA COVID protocols are infusions of placental* stem cells and exosomes.

 

* no aborted tissue, only tissue from the placenta (“afterbirth”), tissue that was previously discarded after the baby’s birth.

 

Find FLCCCA physicians here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/providers/

 

​

 

Long Haul COVID Syndrome

 

Many patients suffer long-term damage and symptoms following their initial course of COVID. The severity of this Long Haul COVID Syndrome (LHCS) is not proportional to the severity of the initial illness.

 

The Long Haul COVID-19 Syndrome (LHCS) is an often debilitating syndrome characterized by a multitude of symptoms such as prolonged malaise, headaches, generalized fatigue, sleep difficulties, smell disorder, decreased appetite, painful joints, dyspnea, chest pain and cognitive dysfunction. The incidence of symptoms after COVID-19 varies from as low as 10% to as high as 80%. LHCS is not only seen after the COVID-19 infection but it is being observed in some people that have received vaccines (likely due to monocyte activation by the spike protein from the vaccine). A puzzling feature of the LHCS syndrome is that it is not predicted by initial disease severity; post-COVID-19 frequently affects mild-to-moderate cases and younger adults that did not require respiratory support or intensive care.

 

The symptom set of LHCS in the majority of cases is very similar to the chronic inflammatory response syndrome (CIRS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, although in LHCS, symptoms tend to improve slowly in the majority of the cases. Furthermore, the similarity between the mast cell activation syndrome and LHCS has been observed, and many consider post-COVID-19 to be a variant of the mast cell activation syndrome. LHCS is highly heterogenous and likely results from a variety of pathogenetic mechanisms. Furthermore, it is likely that delayed treatment (with ivermectin) in the early symptomatic phase will result in a high viral load, which increases the risk and severity of LHCS.

 

Although numerous reports describe the epidemiology and clinical features of LHCS, studies evaluating treatment options are glaringly sparse. Indeed, the NICE guideline for managing the long-term effects of COVID-19 provide no specific pharmacologic treatment recommendations.

 

Given the lack of available treatment recommendations in the setting of large numbers of patients suffering with this disorder globally, the FLCCC developed the I-RECOVER protocol in collaboration with a number of expert clinicians including Dr. Mobeen Syed, Dr. Ram Yogendra, Dr. Bruce Patterson, and Dr. Tina Peers. Although our varied yet often overlapping treatment approaches were initially empiric, while based on both preliminary investigations into and prevailing theoretical pathophysiologic mechanisms of LHCS, the consistently positive clinical responses observed, often profound and sustained, led the collaboration to form the consensus protocol below. As with all FLCCC protocols, we must emphasize that multiple aspects of the protocol may change as scientific data and clinical experience in this condition evolve, thus it is important to check back frequently or join the FLCCC Alliance to receive notification of any protocol changes.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-recover-protocol/

 

 

Is it true that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are abortion-tainted just like COVID jabs?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/ivermectin-hcq-abortion-covid-vaccine/

 

 

​

 

 

moral questions to ponder • questions only a good priest can answer

 

 

 

 

COVID-19

https://youtu.be/ufy2AweXRkc

 

​

 

 

 

Excellent, well-explained though unavoidably somewhat technical! Rare is the video worth the time to watch it, I found the video content especially interesting starting at time stamp 18:00 where he introduces this article:

 

Eweas AF, Alhossary AA, Abdel-Moneim AS. Molecular Docking Reveals Ivermectin and Remdesivir as Potential Repurposed Drugs Against SARS-CoV-2. Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 25;11:592908. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.592908. PMID: 33746908; PMCID: PMC7976659.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.592908/full

 

Ivermectin blocks both the ACE2 receptor site and the COVID-19 spike protein—always better to have more than one effective action site because it is less likely a pathogen will simultaneously mutate two work-arounds.

 

Also, interesting, though structurally dissimilar, both quercetin and hydroxychloroquine are Zinc ionophores, facilitate entry of Zinc ions into host (our) cells where the Zinc ions interfere with the RNA-polymerase necessary for COVID-19 replication—and parenthetically, possibly the replication of RNA viruses in general (HIV?).

 

This seems likely to benefit not only those exposed to the COVID-19 bioweapon itself, but possibly also those forced to take the mRNA jab. If so, the moral calculus needs to be carefully re-calculated.

 

The Moral Principle of Double Effect is established in Catholic doctrine. The most common examples are the cases of abortion and sterilization, normally forbidden if the intents are to kill the baby and be sterilized. BUT a woman whose life is in danger from a tubal pregnancy is morally able to accept (and the Catholic surgeon is morally able to perform) a “salpingectomy,” surgical removal of the affected tube (salpinx) and the ectopic baby (who does indeed die—baptize the baby immediately!).

 

Applying that principle to the mRNA jab: Use of therapies developed from aborted babies is forbidden EXCEPT in dire circumstance according to the aforementioned Moral Principle of Double Effect. The mRNA jab (absent Ivermectin, quercetin, Zinc) is also forbidden because it is a disproportionate risk to the person jabbed. Taking Ivermectin, quercetin, and Zinc may eliminate or significantly reduce the risk of self-harm, so the moral judgment then hinges only (mostly?) on whether or not the risk of harm from not taking the jab outweighs the risk of taking the jab.

 

At that point a good priest's moral guidance is needed.  If a jab is mandated for the family's sole breadwinner to continue working and feeding/housing the family, does that mitigate the problematic source of the jab?  I don't know the answer to that and the answer may vary widely depending on family circumstance.

 

 

 

 

 

​

 

unethical COVID-19 vaccines

 

 

​

https://soundchoice.org/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine-chart/

 

 

 

​

 

 

 

​

 

100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data

by The Exposé, October 31, 2021

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-percent-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-caused-by-just-5-percent-of-the-batches-produced/

 

An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

 

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.

 

The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.

 

The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset.

 

​

 

The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.

 

The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.

 

 

​

 

The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.

 

Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.

 

 

​

 

The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.

 

 

​

 

 

The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.

 

 

​

 

The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.

 

The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.

 

All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.

 

 

​

 

The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.

 

This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.

 

​

 

The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).

 

The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.

 

Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.

 

​

 

The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.

 

This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.

 

​

 

The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.

 

​

 

The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.

 

Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.

 

This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

 

​

 

But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.

 

Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.

 

​

 

The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.

 

Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.

 

The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA.

 

​

 

As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.

 

However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.

 

This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.

 

​

 

The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.

 

​

 

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.

 

 

​

 

The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.

 

The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.

 

​

https://www.ocbj.com/news/2021/jan/19/oc-recalls-moderna-vaccine-lot/

 

 

​

 

 

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.

 

Conclusion

 

This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.

 

The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.

 

One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.

Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes.”

 

But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.

 

Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?

 

Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?

 

Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?

 

Could this just be a quality control issue?

 

A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”.

 

 

 

memes

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

 

Are the consequences really “unintended”?

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

 

navigating this page

 

​