Pharisees • “not Canonically Elected…not a true Pastor, but a Destroyer”

There are three lines of argument that Bergoglio cannot be a true Pope:

  1. his heresies before and after the conclave
  2. his canonical disqualification for
    pre-conclave lobbying
  3. Ratzinger’s invalid renunciation of the Papacy. While Ratzinger was alive, there could not have been two living Popes.


Shortly before he died in 1226 A.D., St. Francis of Assisi prophesied that:


“A man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the pontificate… In those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true pastor, but a destroyer.”




“A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid: Knowing that he, that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment.”

Titus 3:10-11



Prophesied in Holy Writ


The Present Crisis of the Holy See Tested by Prophesy

by Cdl. Henry Edward Manning, D.D.







Destroyer • Heretic • Enabler of the Synagogue of Satan


Bergoglio was a pertinacious public heretic years before the 2013 Conclave



“Team Bergoglio” is a heretical conspiracy to overthrow the Church of Christ


Bergoglio’s Heretical Past is Francis’ Present (only the Spanish language original survives)



Francis re-defrocks fellow Novus Ordo priest in the name of defending Orthodox Judaism



Francis and the Shekinah



Teachings of [Jorge Bergoglio] compared to past Church Teaching



Francis  promotes the 620 noahide laws



Francis jokes about the Crucifixion



Francis denies de fide dogma on Heaven, Hell, and Purgatory



Francis Commits Innumerable Blapshemies and Heresies



Francis Sanctions Idolatry



Pope Francis Touts 'Divine Pleasures' of Sex, Good Food, Rejects ‘Overzealous Morality' in New Book




Aligned with the Synagogue of Satan’s Culture of Death, Bergoglio’s diabolical commentary on Catholic mothers:

“God gives you methods to be responsible. Some think that—excuse the word—that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No.”


and enabling the Culture of Death sodomites, sinful and infertile:

“…who am I to judge?”



Note: We all have a duty to judge objective matters!




Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope





Great Proof Texts For Sedevacantism Show That Francis Is Not The Pope





The Work of the Devil



Warning: some profane language

but otherwise perfectly on target.





the talmudic anti-Pope­


1 week after Bergoglio was “elected,” his newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, recommended daily Talmud study


L’Osservatore Romano recommends Daf Yomi (Daily Talmud Lessons)





scroll to page 6:

L’Osservatore Romano, Anno CLIII n. 96 (46.340),

venerdì 26 aprile 2013, Il Talmud giorno per giorno, pagina 6.







Bergoglio’s Pantheism: Fruit of Jewish-Conciliar Messianism

Despite showy pretense of being “monotheistic,” Judaism is pervaded by polytheism and self-worship. Jorge repeatedly reveals himself as a Marrano, a Talmudic Jew in Catholic garb. This article insightfully reveals yet another instance of the Talmudic anti-Pope.



Bergoglio receives award from the B'nai B'rith




Chabad rabbi “confusing God”On Rosh Hashanah (Talmudic New Year), the shofar (ram’s horn) is blown to confuse Satan and God so “the Jews” may escape accountability for their sins




another Chabad rabbi (right) “confusing God”Such are Satan’s chosen people, including the anti-Pope Bergoglio:

Kosher Frank: ‘Pope’ Francis blows the Jewish Shofar, gives World Jewish Congress an Office in Vatican City





false prophet & abomination of desolation




“As regular readers of [Call Me Jorge] know, Francis is into all things Judaic, especially Chasidism.  Their doctrines creep out here and there in Francis’ sermons and documents.  One of the things which Francis does with regularity is to invert the teachings of the Church.  An example of this is the use of the term ‘pharisee’ which he applies to his enemies, who are not open to Talmudic Judaism and Francis’ anti-Catholic machinations.  Another example is his favorite blasphemous painting, White Crucifixion.  Francis shows his hand, when he inverts Catholic doctrine, as a modernist change agent who is simply following the dictates of ‘The Rebbe’ to be, “modern on the outside and Chabad on the inside.” One of the most blatant examples is Francis teaching the Talmudic formula: Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah (“descent for sake of ascent”).  This teaching simply means that one has to descend into sin, which paradoxically has a positive status in Hasidism, in order to ascend to new heights.  This is done because the god of Talmudic Judaism is one of opposites — a hermaphrodite god of good/evil.  In the Hasidic lore, tzaddiks (saints or righteous people) wrestle not with evil but with goodness as they descend into sin in this process in order to ascend into righteousness.  Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah is one of the foundational beliefs of Orthodox Talmudic Judaism along with Tikkun Olam.  In the later belief the rabbis have the chutzpah to state that God made creation imperfect and the Talmudic Jews are to correct his work.


“The Hasidism of Francis’ mind is also shown when he says such things as, “[Jesus] made himself the devil” and “the Holy Trinity [is] arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”  Who else sees Jesus as a devil or God as a bunch of arguing rabbis other than a Talmudist?  Whether he is parroting the ideas of Heschel, Levinas, Buber, Wiesel, a dead rebbe from the Steppes, or having over rabbis as guests who often gift him with books (Gluck & Steinsaltz) there’s an excellent chance it’s comes from the Baal Shem Tov and his cult in one manner or another.


“In the video clip below the late Chabad Lubavitcher rabbi, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, explains why Hasids should descend (into sin) in order to ascend — they are hunters getting ready to kill their prey.  Another late Chasidic rabbi, Abraham Heschel (of Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate), in a 1965 interview with Ma'ariv explained exactly whom the prey were, “There are those who would like to attack [Christians’] bodies. I want to attack their souls.”  The elevation which takes place is one which will incorporate the prey’s soul into the of cult Talmudic Judaism and worship of their demonic hermaphrodite god.   It’s a total inversion of Catholicism, the religion instituted by Jesus the Christ.  So why is Francis teaching it?”


the Rebbe explains the Hasidic stratagem of “descent for sake of ascent”



See also:




Francis’ rabbinical chums drop by the Vatican for a visit




Jorge colludes not only with Satan’s rabbis, but also with Satan’s financiers and banksters


Lady de Rothschild’s Road to the Vatican



Dangerous Alliance of Rothschild and Vatican of Francis





Jesus Christ against Jorge Bergoglio



Jorge says:


“[I]t does not in any way follow that the Jews are excluded from God’s salvation because they do not believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah of Israel and the Son of God,”

“The Gifts and the Calling of God are Irrevocable” Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.



Really? Jesus contradicts Jorge:


“Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”

John 3:5


“Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son, hath the Father also.”

1 John 2:23

Expectedly, the infallible and unchangeable Magisterium sides with Jesus against Jorge:


“§714 The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews, and heretics, and schismatics, can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire ‘which was prepared for the devil, and his angels,’ (Matthew 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this Ecclesiastical Body, that only those remaining within this unity can profit from the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and that they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, alms deeds, and other works of Christian piety and duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”


Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecumenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation.”), promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 714


…and against Jorge’s public practice of talmudic rites:



“§ 712 It [the Holy Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to Divine worship at that time, after our Lord’s coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the Sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors.”


Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecumenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation.”), promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 712


The problem is not that Jorge associates with Jews, but that he confirms them in a religion that cannot save them.


He is even ashamed of letting them see Jesus, so he does not evangelize them; he hides his pectoral cross from them.





Ashamed of the Cross


Another sad day for Catholics


Pope Francis bows to his Antichrist Talmudic boss


Chabad rabbi “confusing God”


More on the Talmudic Jewess (Rivka Ravitz) Francis bowed to while covering his pectoral cross


It is a habit with him.



“For he that shall be ashamed of me, and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation: the Son of man also will be ashamed of him, when he shall come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.”

Mark 8:38


“For he that shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him the Son of man shall be ashamed, when he shall come in his majesty, and that of his Father, and of the holy angels.”

Luke 9:26



who are the Pharisees?



The Jews confess that they are followers of the Pharisees:


“The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.”

Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474


“Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.”

Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi



…but Jorge says faithful Catholics are “Pharisees.”


“One of the things which Francis does with regularity is to invert the teachings of the Church.  An example of this is the use of the term ‘pharisee’ which he applies to his enemies, who are not open to Talmudic Judaism and Francis’ anti-Catholic machinations.”

the Rebbe explains the Hasidic stratagem of “descent for sake of ascent”




Pope at Santa Marta: There are Pharisees in the Church today like in the time of Jesus



…and whitewashes the Biblical Pharisees


Francis and the Pharisees: At Jews’ behest, Vatican Conference re-evaluates Christ’s Enemies









talmudic zingers from the anti-Pope


“God is purifying the church with sin”

March 7, 2019


“…the memory of him [Jesus] who has made himself sin, who has made himself the devil, the serpent, for us; he has humbled himself to the point of complete annihilation.”

April 4, 2017


“Inside the Holy Trinity they’re all arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”

March 17, 2017


In a blasphemous reference to Our Always Sinless Blessed Mother and the Church, Jorge said: “The Church and the Virgin Mary are mothers, both of them; what is said of the Church can be said also of Our Lady and what is said of Our Lady can also be said of the Church!…All mothers have defects, we all have defects, but when we speak of our mother’s defects we gloss over them, we love her as she is. ”

General Audience, Vatican.va, Sep. 11, 2013


“I often think of Our Lady, when they handed down to her the dead body of her Son, covered with wounds, spat on, bloodied and soiled. And what did Our Lady do? ‘Did she carry him away?’ No, she embraced him, she caressed him. Our Lady, too, did not understand. Because she, in that moment, remembered what the Angel had said to her: ‘He will be King, he will be great, he will be a prophet...’; and inside, surely, with that wounded body lying in her arms, that body that suffered so before dying, inside surely she wanted to say to the Angel: ‘Liar! I was deceived.’ She, too, had no answers.”

Homily, Santa Marta, December 20, 2013

see also: “Pope: Silence Guards one’s Relationship with God”, Vatican Radio, Dec. 20, 2013


The infamously blasphemous medieval Toldot Yeschu was republished by Bergoglio’s friend, Chief Rabbi of Rome Ricardo Di Segni, under the misleading title Il vangelo del ghetto (The Gospel of the Ghetto), subtitled storie di Gesù (the history of Jesus) and described as “leggende e documenti della tradizione medievale ebraica” (legends and documents of the medieval Jewish tradition). What is that “Jewish tradition”?


The Toledot Yeschu embellishes the Torah's blasphemous mockery that Jesus was a mamzer [bastard] conceived adulterously in niddah [menstrual filth] by a Roman soldier named Pandera [Kallah 51a] of a whore [Sanhedrin 106a] and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions because Jesus is accused of sexual perversion, semen [Gittin 57a], that the Sanhedrin justly executed Jesus because he was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a] who worshipped a brick [Sanhedrin 67a], even boasting that the Sanhedrin overcame Roman opposition to the execution of Jesus [Sanhedrin 43a].


See Jesus in the Talmud.


“…a priest that over weeks gives antisemitic talks until Jesus, on the cross, looks at the Virgin, who was at his side, and says to her,

'Mom, let's go since they don't like us;”

January 17, 2014


St. Ignatius Loyola’s advice:


 ”Do nothing, say nothing before considering if that which you are about to say or do is pleasing to God, profitable to yourself, and edifying to your neighbor.”



Heresy before putative elevation to the Chair of Peter—

Loss Of Papal Office Due To Heresy

cum ex apostolatus officio



“In addition, that if ever at any time it shall appear that any… Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church… or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless…those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power.”

Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Feb. 15, 1559, §6 (Roman Bullarium Vol. IV. Sec. I, pp. 354-357)



Some argue that Cum ex Apostolatus Officio has never been abrogated.…

See: To what extent is Pope Paul IV’s « Cum ex apostolatus officio » still in effect?

From Rome, February 20, 2015,



…except that Pope Pius XII’s Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis §34 does appear to hold the effect of Cum ex Apostolatus Officio during a conclave election:


“34. No Cardinal, by pretext or reason of any excommunication, suspension, interdict or other ecclesiastical impediment whatsoever can be excluded in any way from the active and passive election of the Supreme Pontiff. Moreover, we suspend such censures for the effect only of this election, even though they shall remain otherwise in force.” (Cons. Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis, 8 December 1945)


However, as Fr. Cekada, the late sede vacantist, argued, ecclesiastical law is superseded by divine law:


Heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the divine law itself… [T]hey must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the truth of the faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity.” (Maroto, Institutiones I.C. 2:784)


Appointment to the Office of the Primacy. 1. What is required by divine law for this appointment… Also required for validity is that the one elected be a member of the Church; hence, heretics and apostates (at least public ones) are excluded.” (Coronata, Institutiones I.C. 1:312)


“All those who are not impeded by divine law or by an invalidating ecclesiastical law are validly eligible [to be elected pope]. Wherefore, a male who enjoys use of reason sufficient to accept election and exercise jurisdiction, and who is a true member of the Church can be validly elected, even though he be only a layman. Excluded as incapable of valid election, however, are all women, children who have not yet arrived at the age of discretion, those afflicted with habitual insanity, heretics and schismatics.” (Wernz-Vidal, Jus Can. 2:415)


Thus heresy is not a mere “ecclesiastical impediment” or censure of the type that Pius XII enumerated and suspended in paragraph 34 of Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis. It is instead an impediment of divine law which Pius XII did not suspend — and indeed could not have suspended, precisely because it is one of divine law. [emphasis original to Fr. Cekada] http://www.fathercekada.com/2007/06/25/can-an-excommunicated-cardinal-be-elected-pope/


See also: Answering the Objections to the Sedevacantist Position

Compiled by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI



and A manifestly heretic pope and the deception of an adulterated sources: A little Catechism on Sedevacantism* https://web.archive.org/web/20171115180547/http://catholicsinireland.ie/catholic-teaching-1/sedevacantism/deception-in-sspx-s-anti-sedevacantism-catechism/


*the SSPX promotion of the “Little Catechism on Sedevacantism is archived here.



the traitorous lineage of Bergoglio


“Jorge Mario Bergoglio was ordained a bishop on June 27, 1992, by


  • Antonio Cardinal Quarracino † (1962)Archbishop of Buenos Aires, whose principal consecrator was
  • Bishop Anunciado Serafini † (1935) Bishop of Mercedes, whose principal consecrator was
  • Archbishop Zenobio Lorenzo Guilland † (1935)Archbishop of Paraná, whose principal consecrator was
  • Archbishop Filippo Cortesi † (1921), Titular Archbishop of Siraces, whose principal consecrator was
  • Antonio Cardinal Vico † (1898) Cardinal-Bishop of Porto e Santa Rufina, whose principal consecrator was
  • Mariano Cardinal Rampolla del Tindaro † (1882)


Thus, Cardinal Bergoglio is a direct episcopal ‘descendant’ and ‘heir’ of the Rampolla legacy.”


“Team Bergoglio” and the legacy of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro



If you are not familiar with the treachery of Cdl. Rampolla, click here.


The Coverup: Bergoglio’s Jewish Roots




Exploding Bergoglio’s suppression of the Mass in

Traditionis custodes:


Is Quo Primum still binding?





Heresy after putative elevation to the Chair of Peter—

Loss Of Papal Office Due To Heresy


…and idolatry


The apostate ‘faith’ of the Amazon Synod https://akacatholic.com/apostate-amazon-synod/


In Amazon Synod's closing Mass, Pope Francis had an idolatrous staff with four faces. These four faces are pagan deities: Pachacamac (creator deity), Pachamama (mother earth), & the twins Wilka (sun & moon).



Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913:

“The Pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be Pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.”


Pope Innocent III:

“The Pope should not flatter himself about his power nor should he rashly glory in his honor and high estate, because the less he is judged by man, the more he is judged by God. Still the less can the Roman Pontiff glory because he can be judged by men, or rather, can be shown to be already judged, if for example he should wither away into heresy; because he who does not believe is already judged, In such a case it should be said of him: ‘If salt should lose its savor, it is good for nothing but to be cast out and trampled under foot by men.’”


St. Robert Bellarmine:

“A Pope who is a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be a Pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction.”

Saint Robert Bellarmine, De Rom. Pont., lib. II, cap. 30, 420


St. Alphonsus Liguori:

“If ever a Pope, as a private person, should fall into heresy, he should at once fall from the Pontificate. If, however, God were to permit a pope to become a notorious and contumacious heretic, he would by such fact cease to be pope, and the apostolic chair would be vacant.”


St. Francis de Sales:

“Now when the Pope is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church . . . ”


St. Antoninus:

“In the case in which the Pope would become a heretic, he would find himself, by that very fact alone and without any other sentence, separated from the Church. A head separated from a body cannot, as long as it remains separated, be head of the same body from which it was cut off.”


Pope Innocent III, Si Papa, 1198

“The Pope should not flatter himself about his power nor should he rashly glory in his honor and high estate, because the less he is judged by man, the more he is judged by God. Still the less can the Roman Pontiff glory because he can be judged by men, or rather, can be shown to be already judged, if for example he should wither away into heresy; because he who does not believe is already judged. In such a case it should be said of him: 'If salt should lose its savor, it is good for nothing but to be cast out and trampled under foot by men.’”


Billot, De Ecclesia, 1927:

“Given, therefore, the hypothesis of a pope who would become notoriously heretical, one must concede without hesitation that he would by that very fact lose the pontifical power, insofar as, having become an unbeliever, he would by his own will be cast outside the body of the Church.”


Wernz-Vidal, Canon Law, 1943:

“Through heresy notoriously and openly expressed, the Roman Pontiff, should he fall into such, is, by that very fact, and before any declaratory sentence of the Church, deprived of his power of jurisdiction.... a pope who falls into public heresy would by that fact cease to be a member of the Church; therefore he would also, upon that fact, cease to be the head of Church.…”


NOTE: Edward Peters, JD, JCD, Ref. Sig. Ap., in his blog A canonical primer on popes and heresy, December 16, 2016, offers the following comment on Wernz.

“I know of no author coming after Wernz who disputes this analysis.” See, e.g., Ayrinhac, CONSTITUTION (1930) 33; Sipos, ENCHIRIDION (1954) 156; Regatillo, INSTITUTIONES I (1961) 299; Palazzini, DMC III (1966) 573; and Wrenn (2001)…



A. Vermeersch, Epitome Iuris Canonici, 1949:

“At least according to the more common teaching; the Roman Pontiff as a private teacher can fall into manifest heresy. Then, without any declaratory sentence (for the Supreme See is judged by no one), he would automatically (ipso facto) fall from power which he who is no longer a member of the Church is unable to possess.”


Coronata, Institutiones Iuris Canonici, 1950:

“It cannot be proven however that the Roman Pontiff, as a private teacher, cannot become a heretic —If indeed such a situation would happen, he [the Roman Pontiff] would, by divine law, fall from office without any sentence, indeed, without even a declaratory one. He who openly professes heresy places himself outside the Church, and it is not likely that Christ would preserve the Primacy of His Church in one so unworthy. Wherefore, if the Roman Pontiff were to profess heresy, before any condemnatory sentence (which would be impossible anyway) he would lose his authority.”


Edward F. Regatillo, Institutiones Iuris Canonici, 1956:

“‘The pope loses office ipso facto because of public heresy.’ This is the more common teaching, because a pope would not be a member of the Church, and hence far less could he be its head.”


Marato, Institutiones Iuris Canonici, 1921:

“Heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the Divine Law itself, because, although by divine law they are not considered incapable of participating in a certain type of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, nevertheless, they must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the truth of the faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity.”


Baldii, Institutiones Iuris Canonici, 1921:

“The law now in force for the election of the Roman Pontiff is reduced to these points:...Barred as incapable of being validly elected are the following: women, children who have not reached the age of reason, those suffering from habitual insanity, the unbaptized, heretics and schismatics....”


Wrenn, CLSA NEW COMM (2001) at 1618:

“Canon 1404 is not a statement of personal impeccability or inerrancy of the Holy Father. Should, indeed, the pope fall into heresy, it is understood that he would lose his office. To fall from Peter’s faith is to fall from his chair.”


Udalricus Beste, Introductio in Codicem, 1946

“Not a few canonists teach that, outside of death and abdication, the pontifical dignity can also be lost by falling into certain insanity, which is legally equivalent to death, as well as through manifest and notorious heresy. In the latter case, a pope would automatically fall from his power, and this indeed without the issuance of any sentence, for the first See (i.e., the See of Peter) is judged by no one ... The reason is that, by falling into heresy, the pope ceases to be a member of the Church. He who is not a member of a society, obviously, cannot be its head.”


Edward Peters, A Canonical Primer on Popes and Heresy, December 16, 2016:


As for the lack of detailed canonical examination of the mechanics for assessing possible papal heresy, Cocchi, COMMENTARIUM II/2 (1931) n. 155, ascribes it to the fact that law provides for common cases and adapts for rarer… In sum, and while additional important points could be offered on this matter, in the view of modern canonists from Wernz to Wrenn, however remote is the possibility of a pope actually falling into heresy and however difficult it might be to determine whether a pope has so fallen, such a catastrophe, Deus vetet, would result in the loss of papal office.








Jorge and Marxists



“…the hammer-and-sickle crucifix had been designed by the Jesuit “worker priest” Fr. Luis Espinal Camps (1932-1980).”



Surprise! Francis Downplays Blasphemy, says “Not Offended” by Hammer-and-Sickle Crucifix












Sedevacantism, a theological position maintaining that the Chair of Peter is empty and claimed by an anti-Pope, is a controversial subject in the Church. Until such time as there is a credible dogmatic pronouncement, the debate will ensue:


Sedevacantist resources:


Quidlibet blog



Novus Ordo Watch blog



Defection from the Faith & the Church - Faith, Heresy, and Loss of Office Part 1


Anti-sedevacantist and "Recognize & Resist” resources:


True or False Pope? blog



Robert Siscoe's anti-sedevacantist article



Back & Forth:


Counter-argument against Robert Siscoe by John Lane



Answering the Objections to the Sedevacantist Position, Compiled by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI



John Salza’s Arguments Against Sedevacantism Crushed



John Salza Has No Idea What He’s Talking About



The arguments against a Bergoglio papacy include not only the matter of his heresies, but also his violation of Novus Ordo “Canon Law” forbidding pre-conclave lobbying. There is also a line of argument arguing that the irregularities of the Ratzinger resignation disallow a second living Pope.


The “Team Bergoglio” Scandal • disqualified by lobbying?


Some argue that the pre-conclave lobbying by 30 cardinals canonically disqualified Bergoglio. Such lobbying was confessed by Cardinal Danneels.


At the launch of the book in Brussels this week, the cardinal said he was part of a secret club of cardinals opposed to Pope Benedict XVI. He called it a “mafia” club that bore the name of St. Gallen. The group wanted a drastic reform of the Church, to make it “much more modern,” and for Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to head it. The group, which also comprised Cardinal Walter Kasper and the late Jesuit Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, has been documented in Austen Ivereigh's biography of Pope Francis, The Great Reformer.

Cardinal Danneels Admits to Being Part of ‘Mafia’ Club Opposed to Benedict XVI

by Edward Pentin, National Catholic Register, September 24, 2015



Even in the face of Wojtyla’s Universi Dominici Gregis §81-82 that excommunicates pre-conclave “lobbyists” and nullifies such agreements, others argue that the lobbying is moot because ecclesiastical law against heretics voting in conclaves or being elected to the papacy was suspended for conclave elections by Pope Pius XII’s Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis §34.


Momentarily putting aside the canonical considerations, it is incontestable that putative ‘princes of the Church’ conspired for decades to subvert the Church.


From Rome:


Rome — Dec. 25, 2014: Since the scandal regarding Team Bergoglio broke, the From Rome blog has assiduously followed the news and studied what the consequences have been.  On that account more than 25,000 visitors from more than 120 countries have visited this blog to find the news that was not being summarized or published elsewhere.


“Team Bergoglio” is the name given by Dr. Austen Ivereigh, former spokesman to His Eminence, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, ex-Archbishop of Westminster, England, to the group of Cardinals who campaigned for Cardinal Bergoglio in the 2013 Conclave.


The Scandalous consequences of the revelations of Dr. Ivereigh’s book, can be summed up thus: Dr. Ivereigh has written a book alleging as many as 30 cardinals did that which is apparently a violation of the papal law on conclaves, on which account they would be ipso facto excommunicated, Cardinal Bergoglio included, and the election of the latter by 2013 Conclave be null and void and of no effect. — As of this date, no substantial denial has been made by anyone of the accused, and Dr. Ivereigh has not substantially withdrawn, changed, or altered what he wrote.


To continue to assist Catholics and journalists world-wide who wish to know more about this scandal, we present here a summary and links through which readers can grasp the basic and detailed facts of the case which has arisen.


First, our article, The Chronology of Reports on “Team Bergoglio”, contains the master-list of all the news reports of note and blog posts, videos, audios, tweets, etc. which regard crucial information or analysis of the story: this list is in Chronological order according to the date the information was published or presented.


But since the Chronology has already grown to 8 pages in length, for those wishing to grasp the facts, we suggest the following articles:



The other articles which reports facts of lesser interest, though important of themselves, can be found in the Chronology article link above.

The Team Bergoglio Scandal

From Rome, December 24, 20145



“Team Bergoglio” is a heretical conspiracy to overthrow the Church of Christ


“Team Bergoglio” is promoting Schism in the Church



“Team Bergoglio” and the legacy of Cardinal Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro



Editor’s notes:


  • Antipope: A false claimant of the Holy See in opposition to a pontiff canonically elected. At various times in the history of the Church illegal pretenders to the Papal Chair have arisen, and frequently exercised pontifical functions in defiance of the true occupant.…
    entry “Antipope,” Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913 edition
  • The man “subsisting in” the Chair of Peter has spent so much time with the Pharisees that he has embraced their subjective “morality.” In that, he has almost caught up with his family… or have they caught up with him?



the 3rd strike • there cannot be two living Popes


If you believe that Ratzinger was a true Pope, you cannot believe Bergoglio is a true Pope.


The Vatican has known all along that Benedict’s renunciation was invalid as written, and here’s the proof!



Investigating the causes of Pope Benedict’s invalid Abdication







“the great Rabbi Bergoglio”








Compare “the great rabbi Bergoglio”:



We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for “the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29). The Church, which shares with Jews an important part of the sacred Scriptures, looks upon the people of the covenant and their faith as one of the sacred roots of her own Christian identity (cf. Rom 11:16-18).

Evangelii Gaudium, November 24, 2013, §247




…with Scripture and Magisterium: The Mosaic Covenant was conditional and has been revoked






call him “Jorge”


“José María del Corral, director of the ‘School of Neighbors’ educational program in Buenos Aires was one of the Pope’s special guests at his Inaugural Mass…. When Corral ‘bumped into’ the Pope in the elevator, he asked, ‘How should I refer to you now?” The Pope answered, ‘Call me Jorge, what else?'”


Marian Horvat, “‘Call Me Jorge'”, Tradition In Action, March 27, 2013











…and Jorge’s favorite (blasphemous) painting:




dishonorable mention

Francis and the Shekinah



another dishonorable mention for the destroyer
"subsisting in" the Chair of Peter

Francis favorite 1938 modernist painting, “White Crucifixion” by the Byelorussian Jewish painter Moishe Zakharovich Shagal (“Marc Chagall”), not only depicts Jesus as a Chassidic Jew but also contains the common Jewish insult on the Holy Name of Jesus. The Hebrew use of “Yeshu” (ישו) in Chagall’s blasphemy is a Jewish mockery of Jesus’ actual Hebrew name “Yeschua” (ישוע). Yeshu is a Hebrew acronym for
“May his name and memory be blotted out.”


Some “Pope”!







Detail from the “Pope’s” favorite painting:




A key deception of Jorge’s favorite painting is the depiction of Jesus Christ dressed as an 18th century Chasidic Jew. Recall that Jesus Christ repeatedly damned the Pharisees, even judged that followers, “proselytes,” of the Pharisees were “twofold children of hell more than [the Pharisees themselves].” (Matthew 23:15). The early modern sect of Chasidic Jews arose in the 18th century from the rabbi Israel ben Eliezer (1698- 1760 A.D.), also known as the “Baal Shem Tov.” Like other Orthodox Jews, Chasidic Jews are indeed “proselytes” of the Pharisees.



Jorge’s book uses the same ‘Yeschu’ blasphemy


Bergoglio and Skorka in Hebrew

“…A word of caution: the Hebrew translation names the Catholic participant in the conversation ‘Francis’ although it should be pointed out that he was not yet Francis when the book was recorded and published in Spanish… he was then Cardinal Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

As a footnote, we, as Hebrew speaking Catholics can express a certain disappointment with the volume. Despite considerable progress in dialogue between Jews and Christians, the publishers chose to maintain a traditional vocabulary about Christianity, using the word ‘Yeshu’ to translate Jesus and the word ‘komer” to translate the word ‘priest’.*…

“* ‘Yeshu’ instead of ‘Yeshu’a’ is a perversion of the name of Jesus in Hebrew and was used as a polemical curse, an acronym short for ‘May his name and memory be erased’. The word ‘komer’ is used in the Old Testament only for priests that worship idols. The neutral word for priest is ‘kohen’.”



See also: https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2015/09/blasphemies-in-francis-book-rome-and.html



The Blessed Virgin Mary is not safe from Jorge’s blasphemies


Bergoglio blasphemes the Immaculate: A Review of Sundry Examples








blasphemous portrayals of the Holy Family




Why dress Jesus and the Holy Family as modern talmudic Jews?


To plant the lie that Jesus was a talmudic Jew.


Sadly, as he has with his promotion of “White Crucifixion,”
Jorge has scourged Jesus Christ again with his talmudic agitprop.


Francis unveils new sculpture during his ‘World Day of Migrants and Refugees’ mess that depicts St. Joseph and the Blessed Virgin Mary as Chasids




see also: The talmudic ghettofication of St. Joseph and Child Jesus




See also: “Jesus was a Jew.”



Jorge the Humble Slapper



“…If you can honestly say that your own personal threshold for slapping a woman was crossed by what you saw, then I’m thankful that you’re not married to one of my daughters, and you should be too, in fact, even more so.


“While I’d stop sort of categorizing the hand slapping incident as an act of ‘violence against women,’ neither was it a case of some a poor old man being ‘yanked around.’


“Call it what you want, but something ugly happened. What it revealed (yet again) is that Jorge the Humble is a wholesale fabrication, likely created by the same diabolical agents that labored to place him on the balcony at St. Peters back on 13 March 2013.


“On the other side of the spectrum, where the majority seem to reside, are those who are reacting as if this is one of the most egregious and embarrassing things Jorge has done since he assumed the stage name ‘Francis.’


“I got news for you people; it’s not even in the top 20!


“If only this much outrage was engendered when he accused Our Lady of being tempted to call God a liar, or when he claimed that the Divine Law is too difficult for some people to keep (which necessarily implies that God is unjust), or when he even went so far as to claim that God wills that we should occasionally break the Sixth Commandment, and on and on the blasphemies and heresies go.


“So, why are so many given to selective, disproportionate outrage?


“Thanks to the present crisis – that is, the one born at Vatican Council II – many a sincere self-identified Catholic has grown numb to the magnificent affronts that have been hurled at Our Lord and Our Lady over the past six decades. We have arrived at the point where many no longer have a sense for what blasphemy and heresy is, much less how offensive it is.


“Even so, we largely still have that basic human instinct, imparted to each and every man by way of the Natural Law, that tells us right from wrong.


“What Jorge did was just plain wrong and most of us know it.


“Sure, some commentators, like Walsh, are moved to downplay what Bergoglio did, if for no other reason than to score a few points against liberal hypocrites. Still, the majority of us are aware that not even a grumpy old man whose arm has been ‘tugged’ (as Vatican News describes it) has the right to treat a woman that way.


“In other words, it seems that most of us still remain sensitive to certain evils, recognizing them for what they are when we see them; e.g., an animal being abused by a human, a child being exploited by an adult, or a woman being slapped by a man.


“That’s the good news.


“The bad news is that far too few among us are nearly as sensitive to those acts of evil – like blasphemy and heresy – that infringe upon the Sovereign Rights of Christ the King and Our Lady, the Queen Mother. Unfortunately, this isn’t going to change until such time as we are given, by the grace of God, a true Holy Father.”


Jorge the Humble Slapper

by Louie Verrecchio




Just another fag anti-pope


Reposted by moral necessity:

Jorge Bergoglio’s “Other Gustavo”: Why Bergoglio Elevated, Placed and Now Protects Zanchetta



That Time Antipope Bergoglio “Blessed” a Bunch of Cocaine Leaves to Be Used In the Satanic Drug-Fuelled Rituals of an LGBT Group



Sodomite Antipope Bergoglio Forbids U.S. Bishops From Making Even the APPEARANCE of Acting Against the Sodomitical Assault of Young Men and Lads



Is Antipope Bergoglio a Sodomite? I Dunno, But His Child-Pimping Boyfriend Sure As Hell Is.



Antipope Bergoglio’s Pet Name for His Child Pimp Boyfriend Gustavo Vera: “God’s Trotsky”



Antipope Bergoglio Used Physical Violence Against People Whistleblowing On His Pedophile Comrades: Fear For Pope Benedict XVI’s Physical Safety No Longer “Crazy”



Antipope Bergoglio and His Child-Pimping Boyfriend Gustavo Vera Openly Discussed in Argentine Media



Expanded Notes from Argentina on the Natacha Jaitt TV Interview on Gustavo Vera and Antipope Bergoglio’s Pedophile Ring



Full Natacha Jaitt Interview Now Subtitled in English

The folks over at ComplicitClergy.com have paid a transcription service to translate and subtitle the Natacha Jaitt “dinner” interview. The key timestamps are:

4:13 – 7:07 She directly states that Gustavo Vera is a pedophile and runs a trafficking network. And that he uses his organization La Alameda to shut down his competition.

8:49 – 9:51 She recounts how Bergoglio saved pedophile priest Grassi and relocated him to a new area where he had access to vulnerable children.



Nuclear Bombshell Argentinian Whistleblower Interview:

“Bergoglio Allows the “c”atholic Elite in Rome to Have Access to Gustavo Vera’s Child Sex Slaves



Institutional Cannibalism: Fascinating Insight from Argentina on Antipope Bergoglio



Argentine Pedo-Bishop Caught on Tape Being Sodomized by a Taxi Driver?

No Worries – “Tio Jorge” Will Take Care of Everything









‘Pope’ Francis Touts ‘Divine Pleasures’ of Sex, Good Food, Rejects ‘Overzealous Morality’ in New Book





satire—too true to be funny


World Over Satire - Pope Francis Interview (Pt. 1)





Francis & Antonio: Out of Time






Francis makes a cell phone video about [pedophilic priests in] Chile while flying back to Rome





Francis on China





Francis clarifies his recent remarks on Hell





WTFrancis Ep. 4 - Vigano (9/4/2018)





Which One is the Pope? (To Tune of Istanbul/Not Constantinople)





Pope Francis: The Dictator Pope (Clip 1 - World Over Satire)





Pope Francis: The Pope of Insults (Clip 3 - World Over Satire)





Francis Christmas







The 12 Days of Christmas in the spirit of modernism



…On the twelfth day of holidays the V2 anti-popes gave to me:

Twelve press conferences speaking,

Eleven Marxists scheming,

Ten priests molesting,

Nine feet a washing,

Eight candles burning,

Seven council documents writing,

Six new beatitudes preaching,

Five plus heresies,

Four cardinals doubting,

Three meetings at Assisi,

Two John Paul's,

And a new code in ’83.


A thousand thanks to the constant tidal wave of edifying research at the Call me Jorge blog!


















ANTI-pope Jorge is in the news again…

Pfizer and the Vatican

Sources say [ANTI-]Pope Francis met privately twice last year with (((Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla)))

















navigate this page